I received an invite for a show called
"The Happy Show" at
Grand Central Art Center in Santa Ana. A friend of mine,
Jaime Uretsky (who's work I really respect and enjoy), was included in the show and so I was interested in going to check it out if for no other reason than to encourage and support her... so I visited the
GCAC website to find out details...
Well... I happened to know several other people exhibiting in
The Happy Show, as well as some artists showing in a concurrent exhibition (
"Spitting Images") in their main gallery! And
the project room installation looked REALLY EXCITING! (Note: "
Spitting Images" is the correct title for the show despite the typo on their website)
So now I had to go... and I did.
It was all enjoyable, and worth the trip...
But nothing turned out quite the way I expected.
On display: July 5 - July 27, 2008I generally found The Happy Show... not so happy (with notable exceptions).In general, I expected something very uplifting and whimiscal... but this seemed in short supply. One of the notable exceptions, from
Jon Ginnaty and
Diana Donaldson, was a rack of about 25 small ceramic puppies (as seen in the promo image above), each with a tag around its neck that reads "
I will love you forever." This little installation with so many little puppy faces begging for attention, each with a promise of affection, was definitely a "
Happy" highlight. Also, worthy of your time is a whimsical painting by
Alyssa Cordova, and a very fun little animation/video piece by
Jaime Uretsky (You'll have to look for this new work from Jaime in the front window facing the street).
On display: July 5 - August 24, 2008
Spitting Images was proclaimed to explore "unique interpretations of the photo-making process within a group dynamic"... but it seemed surprisingly traditional. Though not as unique as promised, I still felt this was over all a pretty strong showing of work by photographers and printmakers.
The real standout work of the show were a series of digital images from
Neil Sharum. Utilizing his unique images (originating from clubs that cater to teens) as source material, he then uses digital imaging technology to merges images together, create the illusion of a seamless continuous space where his "cast" of very real characters appear to be interacting with one another in narratives of his own devising. In this process Neil becomes a story teller or director of sorts, creating cinematic narratives and building relationships into scenes that in truth do not exist.
Elsewhere in the show...
Mark Chamberlain,
Chris Moore,
Sandra Green, and
Mayra Alford all had strong showings of work that seemed to involve fairly traditional methods of image making. Not ground breaking, but strong nonetheless. (The work of
Scott Angus could also fit into this category, but the 2 small pieces on display do not do adequate justice to his greater body of work.)
There were a few people who seemed to be genuinely bucking tradition and working in new or hybrid ways, including
Janelle Morte and
Leonard Correa, but I didn't necessarily find that work particularly engaging.
Elizabeth Tobias as a possible exception had beautiful large scale and colorful visual representations of music... but they were at root fairly straight forward depictions of audio waveforms... (for a more innovative approach to visualizing music go see the
"Sound!" work of
Andy Carey, currently on display at
Open Bookstore in Long Beach).
p.s. - I hate to be negative, but people need to stop exhibiting the work of
Robbie Miller! His self portraits are thin on concept (sorely lacking, derivatives of Cindy Sherman and others), and from a photo craftsmanship-quality standpoint they are poorly executed prints. Yet somehow I have found his work exhibited in numerous small So-Cal galleries. (Someone has to stand up and say
"NO!" when bad stuff is catching on.)
STOP IT PEOPLE!
On display: July 5 - August 24, 2008Lastly, the project room's installation ("This used to be real estate, now it's only fields and trees")... WAS EVEN BETTER THAN EXPECTED!I can't really describe this installation by
Amy Caterina. You have to experience it for yourself. Suffice it to say that it is an all-encompassing experience, very much enjoyed, and an excellent pairing to
The Happy Show (or rather the whimisical intent of
The Happy Show).
You need to see this!